Disclosure: Some links on this page are monetized by the Skimlinks, Amazon, Rakuten Advertising, and eBay, affiliate programs, and Liliputing may earn a commission if you make a purchase after clicking on those links. All prices are subject to change, and this article only reflects the prices available at time of publication.
Mini PCs can fill a variety of purposes. Some are simple systems designed for use as digital signage and point of sale systems. Others are high-end solutions that combine laptop-class hardware with compact designs, while offering a wide selection of ports. Many can be used as space-saving desktop replacements, media centers, or home file servers, among other things.
However, most mini PCs don't have room inside for discrete graphics. The very few that do include a discrete GPU don't normally let you upgrade or replace the GPU. And that's where external graphics solutions can come in handy.
Current solutions rely on using one of three connection methods. They can use an OCuLink adapter in an existing M.2 NVMe drive. They can connect with a Thunderbolt or USB4 port if the computer has one. Or, in the case of a growing number of mini PCs, they can use an OCuLink port to connect to an external graphics dock.
This summer Beelink introduced a pair of mini PCs that stand out by introducing a fourth connection method. That's because they are using an exposed proprietary PCIe connector. This is provided by their new Beelink EX Docking Station, which allows you to connect a desktop graphics card of your choice and the dock also includes an internal power supply for it. The dock can then be connected to a new range of GTi Ultra mini PCs that have a PCIe connection slot built into their base. Not only does the Beelink EX Docking Station provide an external graphics solution, but it also comes with the option of either including an additional M.2 NVMe drive or using a WiFi card with external aerials to improve network performance.
So when Beelink asked if we'd like to review the Beelink EX Docking Station together with the Beelink GTi12 Ultra, one question I asked myself was whether anyone would want to buy a mini PC in late 2024 that ships with a 12th-gen Intel Core processor that was first released in early 2022? But I decided that it's worth reviewing this computer because it's not just a mini PC with mediocre graphics performance. The combination offers the promise of improved graphics and WiFi performance contained in a compact and integrated solution.
And that's exactly what Beelink sent me to test: a Beelink Gti12 Ultra mini PC and an EX Docking Station. Both were provided to Liliputing for free, with no requirement that they be returned upon completion of the review. This review is not sponsored by Beelink, and the company did not modify or approve the content of this article in any way.
The Beelink GTi12 Ultra is available from Beelink for $738 and up, while the EX Docking Station sells for $159. The mini PC is also available from Amazon with prices starting as low as $609 for the mini PC at time of publication.
First I'll cover the GTi12 Ultra, which follows the emerging trend of mini PCs that are slightly less mini. But there's a good reason for the fact that this computer is a little larger than some of the company's other models. Not only does the increased size allow for better cooling, but the mini PC also includes a built-in 145 W power supply, internal speakers, and an important new feature: a PCIe slot.
Measuring 158 x 158 x 55.8 mm (6.2 x 6.2 x 2.2 inches), the Beelink GTI12 Ultra is available in either a frost silver or space grey coloured metal case. The model featured in this review is the silver version.
On the front of the mini PC, from left to right are the following ports and features:
Above are four evenly spaced pin-holes for the microphone array.
The left and right sides of the computer are just plain metal, and the remaining ports are on the back. From left to right, they are:
Above the ports are four evenly spaced large cutouts for the internal fan to expel the hot air.
The base has two moulded foot ridges running along two sides. This allows some clearance for air to be drawn into the mini PC as the base is covered in small ventilation holes. Along another side is a long rubber plug that covers the slot for the PCIe ports. In each corner is a screw hole covered by a small inset rubber plug, which are for the screws that attach the base.
Internally is where it gets interesting, although access to the innards can only be described as awkward, and involves an awful lot of screws.
First you need to pry out the corner four inset rubber screw covers.
After removing the four screws the base can be lifted off to reveal a fine mesh dust screen. This is held in place by four more screws that then need to be removed before getting any further.
You will now have access to the speakers and the internal power supply.
The next step is to remove the power supply. After removing the two screws that hold it in place, gently pull back on it to free it from the locking slide.
You can then remove the two screws that hold the top section that covers the WiFi aerials in place,
Then gently lift up the cover and flip the power supply over the side of the mini PC's case.
Now remove the four screws holding the twin-speakers in place. Then remove the silver standoff underneath the sponge shock absorber on the side of the case, before similarly flipping the speakers over the side of the case.
When flipping take care not to rip the speaker connection cable out of its ZIF connection as it is quite difficult to reattach.
Finally remove the last three screws that hold the metal heat sink in place that covers the NVMe drives and memory slots.
By now you should have removed 19 screws of varying sizes and 1 standoff.
In the introduction I mentioned that you can get better WiFi performance using the EX Docking Station. To achieve this you can either supply your own wireless card or remove the WiFi card that's inside the GTi 12 Ultra and transplant it to the dock.
For the latter approach, you first need to remove the screw which holds the plastic retainer, WiFi card and aerial cables in place. After removing the retainer, very carefully pop-off both WiFi aerial cables from their RF connectors.
At this point I suggest installing the WiFi card into the EX Docking Station which I'll cover below. This is because I recommend you take the piece of tape you'll find in the docking station which holds down the two unconnected aerial cables, and use it to hold down the now unconnected aerial cables in the GTi12 Ultra. After that you can put the mini PC back together by just reversing all the steps you previously performed.
A quick look at the user-replaceable parts on the motherboard shows that the GTi12 Ultra review model came with two sticks of 16 GB of Crucial (CT16G56C46S5) DDR5 5600 MT/s SODIMM memory for a combined total of 32 GB.
Also included was a single 1 TB (CT1000P3PSSD8) P3 Plus PCIe Gen 4 M.2 2280 NVMe drive. And of course the Intel WiFi 6 (802.11ax) AX200 (AX200NGW) M.2 2230 WiFi card that also supports Bluetooth Version 5.2 (LMP 11.8580). There is also a vacant slot for an additional M.2 2280 NVMe drive that would sit above the WiFi card if present.
On the other side of the motherboard is the CPU, and the GTi12 Ultra is available with either an Intel Core i9-12900HK or an Intel Core i9-12900H. The review unit shipped with the 12900H. The HK variant seems to cost more from Intel whilst having slightly less security and reliability options (see comparison). Otherwise, the two processors are similar: both have 14 cores with 6 Performance cores and 8 Efficient cores with a total of 20 threads. The maximum turbo frequency is 5.00 GHz with a processor base power of 45 W. Both also have an iGPU (Iris Xe Graphics) with 96 execution units and a maximum graphics dynamic frequency of 1.45 GHz.
Finally the motherboard includes two PCIe slots. The long one is physically a Gen 4 PCIe x16 slot operating at x8 and the short one is a Gen 3 PCIe x1 slot. I've had some discussion with Beelink about this as they maintain both slots are Gen 4.
This may be true for some GTi Ultra models but it isn't true for the GTi12 Ultra with the i9-12900H processor as the CPU architecture is different for this model.
The Intel Core i9-12900H processor supports both Gen 4 and Gen 3 PCIe. The i9-12900H incorporates a Platform Controller Hub (PCH) and the processor communicates with the PCH using an internal interconnect bus called the On Package Interface (OPI). The Gen 4 PCIe lanes are connected to the processor with eight lanes allocated to a PCIe slot that can connect to a GPU (and for which Beelink uses when connecting the EX Docking Station). So whilst there is physically a PCIe x16 slot in the mini PC, it can only work as Gen 4 PCIe x8.
The i9-12900H also has two sets of Gen 4 x4 lanes available, and each set is allocated to each of the two NVMe drives within the GTi12 Ultra.
Everything else requiring a PCIe lane, for example network ports, get connected through the PCH which has twelve lanes available but only supports Gen 3 lanes. So the other PCIe x1 slot on the motherboard can only work as a Gen 3 PCIe x1. This is important to remember for when I cover the performance of the EX Docking Station below.
The arrangement of the PCIe slots is also the reason why it is preferable to use the EX Docking Station and not homemade eGPU or similar.
Due to the size constraints of keeping the physical dimensions of the GTi12 Ultra as small as possible, the PCIe x1 slot is located very close to the PCIe x16 slot. For Beelink this isn't a problem as they use a proprietary connection to connect the GTi12 Ultra mini PC with the EX Docking Station.
If you try and use a standard PCIe riser cable with the PCIe x16 slot you will find that the PCIe locking mechanism is absent from the mini PC, and the section of the riser that connects with the latch hits the top of the PCIe x1 slot preventing the riser from being seated. Sure you could take a hacksaw to your riser, but there are other advantages of the EX Docking Station that I'll now explain.
The EX Docking Station measures 225 x 179 x 64.7 mm (8.9 x 7.0 x 2.5 inches) and has a distinctive stepped design with the proprietary PCIe card sticking out horizontally.
Looking at the docking station from above, on the lower step on the left are a power button and a power indicator light. The middle step contains a standard PCIe Gen 4 x16 slot operating at x8 on one side and a 4-pin header for an external fan on the other.
The top step has two 8-pin power sockets for the graphics card, together with a USB 2 Type-A (480 Mbit/s) port and two external WiFi aerial connection points.
On the side nearest the WiFi aerial ports is a power lead socket, as internally there is a 600 W power supply.
The base includes some vents for the power supply and on the internal side is a thermal pad for an NVMe drive.
To access the inside of the docking station, only the four screws that secure the base plate need to be removed. Over half of the inside of the docking station is not accessible, as this is where the power supply is located.
However in the middle at the bottom is a small black circuit board.
There are two types of circuit board provided with the EX Docking Station. The first board supports an NVMe drive and the second board supports a WiFi card. When you receive the EX Docking Station, the NVMe board is preinstalled and can be used to add an M.2 2280 NVMe drive accessible from the GTi12 Ultra. Once you've inserted the NVMe drive into the board, it can be held in place by a retaining screw over on the right side.
While you can install a PCIe Gen 3 or Gen 4 NVMe drive in the dock, as I've already mentioned, the dock will fall back to PCIe Gen 3 speeds when connected to the GTi12 Ultra mini PC. And since there's only one PCIe 3.0 lane allocated to the connection, the theoretical maximum speed is restricted to 984.62 MB/s.
But if you'd rather have your mini PC's wireless card located in the dock where it has access to larger antennas for better performance, then you can remove the NVMe board and replace it with the WiFi board.
You have to choose between one or the other though: you cannot use both the NVMe board and the WiFi board at the same time.
To remove the NVMe board, first remove the two silver screws that cover the connection cable from the board to the dock. Next lift off the cable connection from the board. Then remove the four screws that connect the NVMe board in the dock. Now swap the NVMe board with the included WiFi board. Put back the four board screws, reconnect the cable connection and put back the two silver screws to hold it securely.
Now you can insert either the WiFi card you took from the GTi12 Ultra mini PC, or your own wireless card, leaving it unscrewed at this point. Now remove the tape that you can see holding down the two WiFi aerial cables and reuse it for the WiFi cables in the GTi12 Ultra as mentioned earlier. Finally connect the WiFi aerial cables to the RF connectors and screw the plastic retainer back in place.
Sounds easy? It's not. I found that the WiFi aerial cables had no slack and trying to connect them whilst holding them in place and then screwing down the retainer required more hands, and more patience than I possess.
So I recommend using a strip of masking tape around one of the wires as this allows you to pull it up and hold it in place with one hand. The other hand can then wrestle up the other WiFi aerial cable and get in position. You can then keep both cables in place using a thumb while you hold the retainer between a couple of crossed-fingers of that hand.
You are then free to use the other hand to plug the wires into the RF connectors, grab the retainer and put it over them to keep them in place. By pressing down on it, the wires will stay still, allowing you to use the now free hand to pick up your "preloaded-magnetic-screwdriver-with-screw-attached" to complete the installation.
I also found that you don't have to worry about which cable goes to which RF connector as both ways seem to work the same. Then slam that base back on and screw it up, preferably never to be opened again.
Mounting the GTi12 Ultra mini PC to the dock is straightforward. Remove the long rubber plug from the base of the mini PC and then carefully push the mini PC onto the PCIe slot making sure it goes in as far as possible. You can then screw the retaining bracket onto the dock to prevent the mini PC from sliding back out. I'm doubtful this will happen as it does take some effort to connect the mini PC.
Try and avoid the temptation to pick up the dock by grabbing the mini PC, as whilst it makes for a convenient handle, it probably won't be good in the long term on the connection points.
Adding a GPU is where you might find the first of a couple of design shortcomings. Firstly, the dock only has a cutout that supports up to a two-slot GPU. Anything bigger and you'll have to remove the bracket from the GPU. Once you have seated your GPU you can secure it in place with the included retaining bracket.
Then connect one or two of the included 8-pin power cables from the dock to the GPU as required.
While Beelink's "Graphics Card Compatibility Chart" states that the dock supports up to NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 GPUs, be aware that the dock's internal power supply is rated by Beelink as 600 watts. This may be insufficient as you may need 850 watts or higher depending on your exact RTX 4090 GPU model's specification.
Also, no 8-pin-to-12-pin power cables are included. I'd also recommend that you check your power cables are rated appropriately if you are going to put more that 150 watts on an individual cable.
Beelink's web site indicates that the design will be updated to support three-slot GPUs in future.
To finish off, you can now screw on some external WiFi antennas, which you'll have to supply yourself.
The GTi12 Ultra comes with Windows 11 Pro and the review unit Version 24H2 OS build 26100.863 pre-installed, which I upgraded to OS build 26100.1742 for testing.
My testing was performed using "Balance Mode" in the UEFI (BIOS) as this was the factory default setting. But I also set the Windows power mode to "High performance" through the Control Panel.
I started performance testing by using Crystal Dew World's CrystalDiskMark to measure the storage performance of the GTi12 Ultra's included NVMe drive. The results were very good, with data transfer speeds exceeding the published specifications of this PCIe Gen 4 drive. The sequential read speed was around 5200 MB/s and the write speed was 4700 MB/s.
For some comparison performance benchmarks of how just the GTi12 Ultra stacks up against other mini PCs, I've included the results from a couple of my reviews. First, the most powered AMD mini PC I've tested, namely the MINISFORUM UM890 Pro. And secondly, an Intel mini PC, represented by the Simply NUC Onyx NUC13OXv9.
In the results table below, it is important to note the values for the Power Limit settings of each mini PC when making any comparison. Their values can have a significant impact on the performance.
On Windows I ran:
For all of these tests, I relied on integrated graphics only to give you an idea of how this system compares with other mini PCs when used without an external GPU.
I also ran UL's 3DMark Time Spy which saw a CPU score of 12367, a GPU score of 1804 and an overall score of 2069. In contrast, the UM890 Pro managed a CPU score of 11192, GPU score of 3024 and an overall score of 3395. At the time of reviewing the NUC13OXv9 mini PC I didn't run Time Spy, however I did run it on the very similar Intel i9-13900H mini PC, the GEEKOM Mini IT13. The CPU score was 9063, the GPU score was 1712 and the overall score was 1949.
It is clear that the iGPU is what lets down Intel mini PCs compared to AMD mini PCs. The other point to note, as it will be considered later, is that the AMD CPU performance from the UM890 Pro is overall slightly better than the Intel CPU in the GTi12 Ultra.
If Intel's iGPU is weak in the benchmarks, it is logical to assume it will perform poorly whilst gaming. To look at this briefly, I compared running the Shadow Of The Tomb Raider (SOTTR) built-in benchmark using the high preset on the mini PCs.
When I ran Shadow of the Tomb Raider's built-in benchmark at 1080p resolution, no DLSS and using the high graphics preset using only the integrated Intel Iris Xe graphics, I got an average FPS of 24. On the Mini IT13, the result was actually slightly worse at only 20 FPS, but this is likely due to the lower power limits necessary due to the cooling required. However for the UM890 Pro, the strong performance of the iGPU is shown by the result of 41 FPS which pretty much annihilates the Intel iGPUs.
Since part of the appeal of this mini PC / dock combination is that you can choose your own external graphics card, results with discrete GPUs will vary depending on the card you use. But graphics performance should improve dramatically when you use just about any recent discrete GPU that's compatible with the EX Docking Station.
And while that would also be true if you were using a Thunderbolt 4 graphics dock, I will show below that performance is even better with the EX Docking Station by comparing the performance from both.
At the time of reviewing the Mini IT13, I didn't own the RTX 4060 Ti graphics card that I've used to test this system. However, what I can show is a comparison of using this GPU with the GTi12 Ultra and the UM890 Pro. I will show the performance of each mini PC using the RTX 4060 Ti as an eGPU and connected by Thunderbolt 4 in the case of the GTi12 Ultra and by USB4 for the UM890 Pro.
My eGPU setup consists of an OCuP4V2 with an OCuLink cable. For Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 testing, I connected the OCuLink cable to an M.2 adapter housed in a JEYI NVMe USB4 (ASM2464PD) enclosure.
The significance of the ASM2464PD chip is that it is the fastest Thunderbolt 4 / USB4 to PCIe Gen 4 x4 NVMe Bridge Controller available. It has achieved both Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 certification, and reaches speeds of approximately 3800 MB/s.
When running the SOTTR benchmark on a GTi12 Ultra with an NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti GPU connected via Thunderbolt 4, the system averaged 150 FPS.
When I ran the same benchmark on the MINISFORUM UM890 Pro with my eGPU connected via USB4, the frame rate averaged 158 FPS. In this case, the MINISFORUM mini PC came out ahead.
Let's look into why there is a Thunderbolt 4 / USB4 FPS variation. Because I am using a CUDA-enabled GPU from NVIDIA, I can run the CUDA-Z application to actually measure the throughput by benchmarking how long it takes to write to the GPU's memory. This can also be measured using AIDA 64 as this provides a similar benchmark.
The result for running CUDA-Z on the GTi12 Ultra when it is connected to the GPU by Thunderbolt 4 gives a Host to Device pageable memory throughput of 2810.89 MB/s (2680.67 MiB/s). For AIDA64, memory write was 2743 MB/s.
Yet for the UM890 Pro connected to the GPU by USB4, CUDA-Z reports 3861.78 MB/s (3682.88 MiB/s) and for AIDA64 it was 3789 MB/s.
The reason for this throughput discrepancy is simple: data transfer over Thunderbolt 4 is slower than over USB4. It has taken me a long time to definitively substantiate this statement, but I've finally located the Intel presentation that confirms it:
Over Thunderbolt 4 data transfer speeds can only reach a maximum of 3,000 MB/s.
USB4, however, can reach the maximum of the four lanes of PCIe Gen 3 each running at 8.0 GT/s per lane that USB4 has available. With the 128b/130b encoding overhead, it means that USB4 data transfer speeds can reach a maximum of 3938.46 MB/s.
These eGPU throughput measurements explain why the average FPS in SOTTR was slower for the GTi12 Ultra compared to UM890 Pro.
Both Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 in these instances use PCIe tunneling. But things look different when you use a direct PCIe connection. The Peripheral Component Interconnect Special Interest Group (PCI-SIG) created OCuLink as basically a low-cost cable to extend PCIe outside the box to allow externally attached PCIe devices.
So now I will show the performance of both mini PCs using the RTX 4060 Ti as an eGPU while connected by the PCIe connector from the EX Docking Station in the case of the GTi12 Ultra and by OCuLink for the UM890 Pro.
Once I'd hooked up the GTI12 Ultra to the EX Docking Station with RTX 4060 Ti, using the same SOTTR settings as before, I got an average FPS of 178
But when I used the UM890 Pro and my eGPU OCuP4V2 with RTX 4060 Ti connected by an OCuLink cable, the frame rates averaged only 165 FPS. That's better than USB4, but still lower than the Beelink system.
So why then is using the EX Docking Station with the GTi12 Ultra faster than with OCuLink and the UM890 Pro? Again it is just down to hardware.
My RTX 4060 Ti GPU has a PCIe Gen 4 x16 interface, however like the EX Docking Station, it is electrically restricted to using only half the lanes, i.e. it uses x8. So connecting it into the EX Docking Station that also has a PCIe Gen 4 x16 slot operating at x8, means that there is no speed degradation and the GPU operates at PCIe Gen 4 x8 speeds, and a maximum theoretical throughput of 15753.85 MB/s.
OCuLink, whilst it supports the same theoretical maximum, if you look at how the OCuLink cable connects to the UM890 Pro, you will see that it is simply an adapter that replaces an NVMe drive, which in turn, is installed in a PCIe Gen 4 x4 slot. This results in it having half the throughput speed capability of the EX Docking Station.
Like before this can be verified by running CUDA-Z and AIDA64.
Now the result for running CUDA-Z on the GTi12 Ultra when it is connected to the GPU by the EX Docking Station gives a Host to Device pageable memory throughput of 11640.24 MB/s (11101 MiB/s). For AIDA64, memory write was 12352 MB/s.
In contrast, the UM890 Pro connected to the GPU by OCuLink only gives 6458.84 MB/s (6159.63 MiB/s) and for AIDA64, the memory write was just 6376 MB/s.
Whilst the throughput from the EX Docking Station is nearly twice that of the OCuLink eGPU, the same gain is not observed with the SOTTR benchmark. As shown above, the GTi12 Ultra the average FPS was measured as 178 and not double the UM890 Pro average of 165 FPS.
What can be seen from the SOTTR screenshots is that the performance has become GPU bound, specifically at 44%. So it's worth checking what the expected performance in SOTTR with these settings is for this specific card. I couldn't find any actual values with a simple Google search, as searching now just seems to yield adverts. But using Google's AI, Gemini, suggests that with the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB GPU, the average FPS in SOTTR with high preset is in the range of 110 to 130.
Given the UM890 has a slightly more powerful CPU compared to the GTi12 Ultra, using a better GPU with the OCuLink eGPU will probably not yield much of an improvement as it may be restricted by the OCuLink throughput. However this shouldn't be a problem with the EX Docking Station. The increased throughput is one of its advantages, and provides the opportunity for using a more powerful GPU for better graphics whilst squeezing out the most from the CPU performance.
Just as a footnote here, ideally I would have liked to include testing the GTi12 Ultra connected to the eGPU by OCuLink through using an M.2 adapter in an NVMe slot. However accessing the inside of the GTi12 Ultra is just too hard and time consuming just for the sake of testing usage that probably nobody will attempt.
With the EX Docking Station using its NVMe board, I installed a Samsung 980 PRO NVMe M.2 SSD 500 GB (MZ-V8P500BW) drive, which is a PCIe Gen 4 drive capable of sequential read speeds of up to 6900 MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5000 MB/s.
When tested using CrystalDiskMark, I achieved a sequential read speed of 891.03 MB/s and a sequential write speed of 873.80 MB/s. Which is basically as expected, given it runs at PCIe Gen 3 x1 speed whose theoretical maximum speed is capped at 985 MB/s.
Besides a major graphics performance, the other key benefit from using the EX Docking Station is the improved WiFi performance offered by the external aerials.
The WiFi performance from the WiFi card in the GTi12 Ultra is perfectly okay. For the 5 GHz band, download measured 646 Mbits/sec and upload measured 852 Mbits/sec.
However, when connected to WiFi through the EX Docking Station having transplanted the wireless card, download improved to a massive 1.58 Gbits/sec and upload improved to 1.14 Gbits/sec. This is very good from a WiFi 6 card.
Perhaps even better results might be obtained if using your own supplied WiFi 6E or WiFi 7 card in the dock?
Finally I'll conclude with a couple of additional testing notes without covering them in too much detail.
I tested the GTi12 Ultra and EX Docking Station after installing Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS. I got everything to work once the required additional packages were installed with the exception of the fingerprint reader. This is simply not recognised.
I also ran CUDA-Z and interestingly the performance was lower than on Windows. The result gave a Host to Device pageable memory throughput of 10027.43 MB/s (9562.9 MiB/s).
During general use and also in testing, the cooling was very effective and the fan noise was hardly audible, even when under load. Running Cinebench R23 for a ten minute throttling test saw the CPU package temperature reach an average of around 70 °C with a single random spike of 91 °C for some unexplained reason.
As it stands, the GTi12 Ultra is a good mini PC, but without the EX Docking Station it is hampered by poor graphics performance. So as a standalone mini PC I couldn't recommend it given there are much better mini PCs in the same price range that have higher-performance AMD processors.
However as a combo package with the EX Docking Station it is a different story. Whilst you can couple a DIY eGPU with the GTi12 Ultra, it is still not going to be as good as the EX Docking Station combination, and it will also probably cost more.
Together with the docking station makes this a much more attractive mini PC, since it brings three significant advantages:
So my answer to the question I posed at the start of this review: yes, it's definitely worth buying a mini PC with a two-year old Intel processor if you also get the docking station that leads to better graphics and WiFi performance.
And if you do want a newer processor, Beelink's EX Docking Station is also compatible with the Beelink GTi14 Ultra mini PC, which comes with Intel Meteor Lake processor options. That model is available from Beelink with prices starting at $849 for a model with an Intel Core Ultra 7 155H processor or $919 for a Core Ultra 9 185H version. But you can also pick up a Core Ultra 9 185H model for $799 from Amazon.
I'd like to thank Beelink for providing me with the GTi12 Ultra and EX Docking Station for review.